Monrovia, Liberia – Contrary to unfiltered reports– the Liberia National Fire Service (LNFS) in 2022, signed a contractual agreement with Cactus Motors Inc. for the procurement of emergency response vehicles, aiming to enhance the country’s firefighting and disaster response capabilities.
The Agreement
The agreement, finalized on July 5, 2022, was signed by former LNFS Director Alex K. Dickson, representing the government agency, and Mr. Martin Doe, Sales Manager of Cactus Motors Inc., a Monrovia-based automobile supplier. Under the terms of the contract, Cactus Motors is expected to supply the LNFS with the following vehicles:
- Six (6) mini fire trucks
- Three (3) pickup trucks
- One (1) water tanker
- One (1) ambulance
The total cost of the procurement is estimated at $458,489, with individual vehicle prices outlined in the contract. For example, the mini fire trucks are priced at $49,950 per unit, while the ambulance costs $300,000.
Maintenance and Service Provisions
In addition to the supply of vehicles, the contract includes provisions for maintenance and repair services. Cactus Motors Inc. has committed to:
- Providing repair and maintenance services upon request, with prior approval from the LNFS.
- Ensuring that all supplied vehicles meet the agreed-upon specifications as outlined in the proforma invoice attached to the contract.
The Concerns
Despite the outlined terms, inconsistencies in the contract have sparked concerns. Notably, the document references both “Cactus Motors, Inc.” and “City Motors Inc.,” raising questions about potential clerical errors or misrepresentations. This has led to calls for clarification from the LNFS and the Ministry of Justice to ensure transparency and accountability in the procurement process.
Government Endorsement
The contract received endorsement from high-ranking government officials, including Finance Minister Hon. Samuel D. Tweh Jr. and Justice Minister Hon. Frank Musa Dean Jr., underscoring the government’s commitment to improving public safety infrastructure. However, the inconsistencies in the contract have prompted scrutiny from stakeholders and the public.
