President George M. Weah has vetoed several portions of the recently passed act to amend certain sections of the new election law of 1986, as amended through 2014.

In a communication addressed to Speaker Bhofal Chambers on Tuesday, March 14, during the 17th Day Sitting of the 6th Session of the 54th Legislature of the Honorable House of Representatives, the President stated several reasons for his veto of some portions of the amendment to the new elections law.

The new elections law was passed on February 24, 2022, by the Legislature, entitled An act to amend certain sections of the new elections law (1986) as amended through 2014. 

The president’s veto is in line with article 35(1), Charter V, of the 1986 Constitution of the Republic of Liberia. This article grants the President the right to veto any instrument passed by the Legislature. The President’s veto can be overturned by the Legislature by two third majority in accordance with the Liberian Constitution.

The sections vetoed by the President include sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, 2.19, 2.24, and 5.12, and the requirements that a political party’s list of candidates for the National Elections Commission (NEC) shall include no less than 30% of each gender.

The President said while he supports the 30% gender representation section and others, there are sections or items in the bill that are already addressed by existing constitutional provisions, existing statutes, or that are better addressed through the existing, independent recruitment process of the NEC.

President Weah further noted that the Republic of Liberia is about seven months away from the 2023 General Elections, and therefore, certain changes in the Elections Law at a time so close to the ECOWAS Protocol A/SP1/12/01 on Democracy and Good Governance’s six-month restriction would tend to send mixed signals to the electorates and present the potential to cause delays in the election processes.

Section 2.1, which talks about the office of the National Elections Commission, has been itemized in its entirety. The President therefore believes that the existing law already provides for checks and balances regarding the scrutiny of persons to serve as commissioners of the NEC.

Section 2.2(3), which talks about appointment and tenure, has been itemized in its entirety. Objection: Section 2.2(3) would require a commissioner to be retired at age 70, even if his or her seven-year tenure has not expired. The Presidency notes, however, that the period within which a commissioner would become statutorily ineligible to serve as a commissioner of the NEC is already addressed in Amendment 2.2(1), which limits a commissioner’s tenure to a maximum of two terms. The Presidency therefore believes that the two-term limit within Amendment 2.2(1) addresses the period within which a commissioner would be ineligible to serve as a commissioner of the NEC.

Section 2.10(c) has been item vetoed in its entirety. Objections: The Presidency believes that the existing Section 2.10 of the Elections Law already provides for proper administrative functions and supervision within the NEC and that the Republic of Liberia is about seven months away from the 2023 General Elections, so such administrative changes should be considered in a non-election year.

Section 2.11: The words “or the Board of Commissioners” in the last sentence of section 2.11 have been item-vetoed.  Objection: The Presidency believes that the remaining language in Section 2.11 captures when and how the Vice Chairperson may act.

Section 2.12, which talks about legal staff, has been item vetoed in its entirety. Objection: This section would mandate the NEC to appoint a legal counsel and research officer from a shortlist of candidates submitted to it by the Liberian National Bar Association. The Presidency believes that the existing Section 2.12 of the Elections Law, which provides that the NEC shall appoint legal counsel and research officers through an open and transparent selection process, is broad in that it allows all qualified lawyers to apply directly to the NEC without having to pass through an intermediary. The current process also maintains the independence of the NEC in its recruitment process.

Section 2.19(1), which talks about the executive director, has been item vetoed in its entirety. Objection: This section would mandate the NEC to select an Executive Director from the list of candidates submitted to it by the Civil Service Agency. The Presidency believes that the existing Section 2.19 of the Elections Law, which provides that the Board of Commissioners shall appoint the Executive Director through an open and transparent process, is broad in that it allows all qualified persons to apply directly to the NEC.

Section 2.24(1), which talks about magistrates of elections, is hereby vetoed. Objection: The Presidency believes that the remaining language in Section 2.24(1) adequately captures the roles of the Magistrates of Elections and how they would be obligated to follow instructions issued to them by the Commission. 

Section 5.12(3)(a), which talks about the hearing and determination of complaints, has been item vetoed in its entirety. The words “on an appeal from the Board of Hearing Officers” have been item vetoed.

The amendment states that the deadline for a political party or candidate to file a complaint should be November 2, 2023. The President said Article 83(c) of the 1986 Constitution gives the NEC thirty days to investigate and issue a final ruling. ” Assuming the NEC uses the entire thirty days, December 2, 2023, will be the deadline for the NEC to render a final ruling. The dissatisfied party would then have seven days to perfect its appeal to the Supreme Court, which has seven days to render its decision. Hence, election cases should be disposed of before the second working Monday in January 2024, which is the date the 55th Legislature shall first assemble.

The Presidency is willing to work with this honorable Legislature on ways to enhance the NEC’s capacity to speedily dispose of election cases.

According to the Chief Executive, apart from the specific portions and sections that he has item-vetoed herein, he hereby approves the other portions and sections in the bill.

Following the reading of the above vetoed sections from the President, the Plenary, through a motion made by Maryland County District No. 1 Representative, P. Mike Jury, sent the instrument to the Committees on Judiciary, Elections, and Good Governance to report before the closure of the Legislature for its first quarter break this March.

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *